Volume  4—  Credit  Risk  Management  ©  Copyright  2002,  CCRO.  All  rights  reserved.  8  3.0  The  Cost  of  Credit  Economic  costs  being  placed  on  the  business  should  be  evaluated.  Credit  risk  managers  should  develop  measures  that  reflect  these  costs  and  encourage  optimization  of  risk  utilization  by  traders  and  trading  management.  Some  of  the  costs  are  counterparty  specific  others  apply  more  generally  to  the  trading  business.  Energy  marketing  and  trading  companies  should  assess  a  counterparty  “credit  charge.”  The  purpose  of  this  credit  charge  is  to  give  traders  an  incentive  to  trade  with  stronger  counterparties  or  collect  an  appropriate  risk  premium  for  taking  weaker  counterparties  by  creating  a  transparent  cost  of  dealing.  Note  that  while  we  view  this  approach  as  a  best  practice,  it  is  not  easy  to  implement,  especially  in  day-to-day  trading.  The  challenges  of  applying  a  credit  charge  to  regular  trading  activities  are  heightened  because  the  online  trading  platforms  do  not  include  a  credit  charge  for  the  prices  posted  on  these  platforms.  Additionally,  some  trades  could  qualify  as  exposure-reducing  trades  (see  discussion  in  Section  VI),  thus  providing  an  inherent  benefit  to  the  organization.  Structured  transactions  should  be  priced  inclusive  of  a  credit  reserve  reflective  of  the  credit  risk  of  the  transaction.  There  are  a  couple  of  methods  for  developing  these  costs.  One  is  to  apply  historical  default  rates  to  the  transaction  price  as  a  deduction  from  the  value  of  the  transaction.  For  example,  for  a  particular  transaction  type  and  maturity,  counterparty  A  may  have  a  2%  default  rate  on  financial  obligations.  By  multiplying  this  default  rate  by  the  fair  value  of  the  transaction,  a  charge  may  be  assessed.  The  advantage  of  this  approach  is  that  the  credit  assessment  is  directly  related  to  real  performance.  Unfortunately,  historical  information  may  not  always  be  available.  Furthermore,  this  method  is  tied  specifically  to  financial  default,  not  to  performance  under  the  contract  generally.  Another  method  is  to  look  at  specific  counterparty  risk  premiums  in  traded  bonds  or  default  swaps  and  apply  that  risk  premium  (percentage)  to  the  transaction  price.  For  example,  counterparty  A  may  have  a  one-year  credit  spread  to  treasury  bills  of  30  basis  points.  A  credit  assessment  can  be  obtained  by  multiplying  these  30  basis  points  by  the  fair  value  of  the  transaction.  Unfortunately,  while  this  may  be  the  most  current  market  assessment,  it  may  not  be  directly  applicable  to  a  non-rated  counterparty.  In  addition,  this  approach  assumes  that  the  company  issuing  credit  has  a  rating  of  AAA  or  similar,  which  could  result  in  overcharging  counterparties.  This  method  also  assumes  that  the  bond  market  is  efficient,  and  that  the  spread  relative  to  risk-free  rates  is  highly  correlated  to  the  cost  of  credit  over  the  life  of  the  transaction.  
Purchased by unknown, nofirst nolast From: CCRO Library (library.ccro.org)
            

































